But more and more scholarship suggests that leaders make a large difference in determining whether and how countries go to war and it's not just in dictatorships indeed, in the korean war, the united states tested geographic constraints by pushing beyond the prewar dividing line, the 38th parallel, in. Mack, andrew, why big nations lose small wars: the politics of asymmetric conflict, world politics , vol 27, (cambridge university press, 1975) a big nation is not threatened in its basic survival when fighting small wars and is thus more vulnerable to rising political and economic costs in a protracted. Why this eagerness to go to war with yet another great power, and at a time when germany already once more hitler had to restrain the enthusiasm of the german navy for war with the united states in the weapons technology of the 1930s and 1940s, big warships were the system with the longest.
It was the most global war in history it directly involved more than 100 million people from over 30 countries in a state of total war, the major participants threw their entire economic, industrial, and scientific capabilities behind the war effort, blurring the distinction between civilian and military. They continue to fight needless wars and see more and more people killed for nothing (more people have died in iraq sure, the taliban was not popular with women and wasn't big on human rights, but it wasn't who benefitted the most from the invasion why american oil drilling companies of course. Get an answer for 'why did the united states enter world war i' and find homework help for other history questions at enotes politically, many europeans hoped that us entry in the war would result in a treaty based on wilson's fourteen points, but the treaty of versailles that officially ended the.
Yes, the iraq war was a war for oil, and it was a war with winners: big oil it has been 10 years since operation iraqi freedom's bombs first landed in baghdad the state department future of iraq project's oil and energy working group met from february why women are less free after iraq war. Why did the us lose the vietnam war sign in sign up the irony is that had that pilot had his way america would have lost so much more that just the vietnam war vietnam war: why did the united states intervene in vietnam in 1965 military history and wars: who would win in a war.
The benjamin is the most popular currency note in the world if the obama administration really wants to deny resources to terrorists, why is it giving tens of billions the real reason for this war on cash--start with the big bills and then work your way down--is an ugly power grab by big government. The united states, in other words, dropped more bombs on north korea during the ill-named limited war than it dropped during the entire engagement against japan during world these statements—in light of north korea's history—sound less like threats of war and more like threats of preservation. The end of war in the americas is part of a larger global trend according to data collected by the this demands the question, if the world is entering a new era of peace, why are islamic nations still and citizens of islamic states (as defined as members of the organization of islamic cooperation) are.
Find out more about overdrive accounts studies, security, grade: 2,0, free university of berlin (center for global politics), course: international security, language: english, abstract: warfare patterns have changed in a number of aspects which make it more difficult for regular state armies to defeat a. Why did the us go to war in vietnam this is a question historians continue to debate one of the main reasons it remains a source of argument is that it is difficult to say when rather than identifying one starting point, it is more accurate to understand us intervention in vietnam as a gradual process. Simply stated, the united states seeks to deter aggression or blackmail against nato allies from a nuclear-armed russia by threatening to use atomic weapons and the place where it is most likely to begin is in a future military confrontation over three small baltic states -- estonia, latvia and lithuania. State capability matters more than size one possibility is that what matters is not so much the size of government but how capable it is economists define state capability as the capacity to collect taxes to fund public goods like defence and infrastructure.
The war proved far more costly than korea because the geography and landscapes of vietnam were far more conducive to insurgency operations there were also far more restrictions placed on american commanders than during the korean war and the united states in the 1960s was a far. War is no stranger to any country in the world, but some countries are much more experienced in the art of war then others there are many reasons to wage a war, but the one that can explain the reason why big states are more war prone then small ones is the need for more power. The civil war that broke out in yemen in 2015 has grown more complex and precarious what started as a saudi-led military intervention against the houthi this chapter analyses the intervention through a strategic lens, arguing that it should be viewed more scientifically in terms of why riyadh has found.
Part of the explanation for why southern states dominate the most dependent category is historical during the many decades in the 20th century when the red states—the ones governed by folks who think government is too big and spending needs to be cut—are a net drain on the economy, taking in. Over the course of history most bloody wars were caused by big kingdoms and empires, or so it seems i know a lot of history, especially european and it appears to me that most bloody and. (iran is much more heavily involved in the syrian war, sending thousands of troops and shiite volunteers to fight alongside assad's soldiers and propping up why well it's because although the saudis are actually dropping the bombs from their planes, they couldn't do it without the united states.